March 19, 2010
Contrawise, I didn’t enjoy it, but it could have been worse.
Timothy Burton is a man who was once well regarded. Now, he is less so. Supposedly. I suppose you can’t blame him for being out of favor with the cool kids: Hot Topic and such have run him and his works into the ground, coolness-wise. Making garbage such as Corpse Bride and that remake of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory really didn’t help things either. Still, you have to give him a little credit. This is the guy who made Big Fish.
I guess what I am saying is that it was really up in the air whether Alice in Wonderland was going to be complete shit, or just a decent popcorn flick.
I mean, I don’t think there was any chance it was going to be a good movie, perse. Alice in Wonderland didn’t need this sort of treatment, especially starring Kefka, the Mad Clown. Nobody with any sense was saying “Thank god, a remake of Alice in Wonderland. About fucking time.” Well, I guess, except the people at Hot Topic.
Still, I think Burton managed to make a fun enough ride. I enjoyed myself.
I guess I’ll get issues out of the way: the biggest problem is that they apparently couldn’t buy a foley artist which could make a decent snicker-snack sound effect. Fable knew that was the sound the Vorpal Sword makes. It’s right there in the poem. There isn’t even a vague attempt to make the sword in the movie sound this way. I was completely let down.
Additionally, the themes of the plot are really, really confused in the story. The story would seem to revolve around Alice not letting other people control her life back in London, and not giving in to the concept of fate, and yet, in the end, she gives in to her fate in Wonderland completely. She only pays lip service to diverging from the path. She never actually does. Even her diverging is “part of the plan,” and she doesn’t really think for herself throughout the story. Somehow, this magically translates to her deciding to think for herself and blaze her own path in the real world. It’s really not hard to set up that kind of parallel narrative. It really isn’t. I’m very confused why the movie had trouble with it. Would it really have been that hard to create a fate for Alice that she sees and then doesn’t follow?
Still, as I said, it was a pretty enjoyable ride if you just turn your brain off. Moreso than Avatar, I think. Avatar kept pounding how “significant” it was into your head, and thus stopped you from just being able to turn yourself off and enjoy the dumb ride. Alice is good enough not to do that. You can just have fun seeing the cool special effects and whatnot, and it works. I saw the film in 3D, and that worked pretty well, too. A bit subtle, and not either in your face with tricks or going “3D IS THE FUTURE OF ALL MEDIA” or whatnot.
I was also very pleased with the amount of Johnny Depp in the film. I feared he was going to play this like Willy Wonka, which was, honestly, pretty annoying. Plus, from everything I saw, I thought this was going to be THE MAD HATTER’S ALICE IN WONDERLAND STARRING THE MAD HATTER, but although he was certainly a main character, he got out of the way to let other characters play a part. I appreciated that. It was still, for the most part, Alice’s show. Which is as it should be.
This wasn’t the best movie. Not at all. But it was passable. It was enjoyable. I did not feel my time wasted. I suppose that’s enough, when you’re going to the theater just to go to the theater, hm? Maybe people do that all the time. I don’t tend to. But I did this time, and I didn’t leave disappointed. I guess I give this movie a slightly better than meh out of five stars. If you have any interest in it, feel free to go see it. You probably won’t hate it, and you’ll have a good hour or two of viewing.