{"id":2706,"date":"2011-09-27T00:23:04","date_gmt":"2011-09-27T06:23:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/?p=2706"},"modified":"2011-09-26T19:58:14","modified_gmt":"2011-09-27T01:58:14","slug":"close-readings-and-lack-thereof","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/?p=2706","title":{"rendered":"Close Readings, And Lack Thereof."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>There is a fundamental difference between how I look at the world and how my students look at the world, I am finding.<\/p>\n<p>I assigned what I thought would be a super-easy and fun paper: play some games, including some on a list I gave you of free online games if you don&#8217;t already have access to stuff, and tell me about your experiences playing them and how those experiences reflect on the overused &#8220;are games art?&#8221; question. I went out and put together a list of art games I really enjoyed, and got a lot out of, as well as some silly stuff I put in there for fun. I was really looking forward to seeing how my students interpreted the games.<\/p>\n<p>Well, I&#8217;ve read several drafts of their essays now. None of them are &#8220;doing it wrong,&#8221; really. But wow, I am not getting the kind of essays I was expecting.<\/p>\n<p>When I play something that is supposed to be an art game, I play it, and then I sit back and, like I do with poetry or literature, I go &#8220;what is this trying to say? What does it say?&#8221; I look at the parts and see what kind of deeper message might be hidden there. I piece things together. I make theories. I do close readings. I analyze.<\/p>\n<p>This is what I expected my students to do, but looking at things in this way just doesn&#8217;t seem to be in their vocabulary at all. They don&#8217;t read into anything: they take what is there. In a lot of these art games, there is not a whole lot going on on the surface, so they find them stupid, repetitive, or otherwise boring. This is as far as they go. <\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. There are definitely movies, games, and whatnot where that is the level of engagement I have with them. I am not trying to find deeper meaning in Crysis 2. I am just trying to shot mans, and that&#8217;s as far as I go. However, when you present something to me and tell me it&#8217;s art, I assume this is how I&#8217;m supposed to approach it. I assume there&#8217;s something underneath the surface. They haven&#8217;t been trained for that. When I look at something like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ludomancy.com\/games\/today.php\">Today I Die<\/a>, I see a message about how changing your outlook on life can CHANGE your life. They look at it and see a dumb game where you swap some words around for no apparent purpose.<\/p>\n<p>I wonder if all my schooling and English classing trained this in me, or if it&#8217;s just something I&#8217;ve always done. I certainly can&#8217;t think back and think about myself as someone who would approach these games this way. I also wonder if it&#8217;s something I should be trying to teach my students. I mean, it&#8217;s not completely necessary to look at art like that, outside the sort of circles I roll in. Still, maybe not having that indicates a lack of trying to look through and understand any message, or how anything works. I don&#8217;t want to presume this about my students, but I wonder.<\/p>\n<p>In any case, this assignment has been a seriously eye-opening experience. I&#8217;ve also been fairly impressed by how well some of the people who keep going on and on to me about &#8220;not being able to write essays&#8221; are doing, as they&#8217;re doing better than some of the people not telling me these things. I&#8217;ll keep on teaching. We&#8217;ll see what else happens.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There is a fundamental difference between how I look at the world and how my students look at the world, I am finding. I assigned what I thought would be a super-easy and fun paper: play some games, including some on a list I gave you of free online games if you don&#8217;t already have [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7,23],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2706"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2706"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2706\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2707,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2706\/revisions\/2707"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2706"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2706"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/getmeoutofthis.net\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2706"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}